A GREAT AND TERRIBLE SORROW WILL ENGULF ESPECIALLY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS IN JUST THE NEAR FUTURE.  Let's see if we can identify this situation and at least soften the impact of what is about to take place.

DO ADVENTISTS CONCENTRATE ON END-TIME PROPHECY "TOO MUCH?"  NEW ADDITION!
NEW  The Horrifying Ignorance of the Adventist People, Part 3!
The Adventist people live life as usual expecting that the Lord would even feed them in the Time of Trouble even without them making any physical preparations.

Discover virtually all the writings of Ellen G. White for your java-enabled browser here.

Urgent message that needs to be much updated.  Created 10/6/2008

Labels
Probing the concept of understanding that, as the end draws near, people are not what they supposed to be recognized by what they claim to be, but by the positions they hold within their hearts.
Labels2.htm
Probing how to tell what a man is by what he believes and what positions he holds, part 2.
How the Worldwide Church of God was Destroyed!
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE WORLDWIDE CHURCH OF GOD:  A LESSON-BOOK FOR EVERY CHURCH OR ORGANIZATION UNDERGOING CHANGE!  Examining shocking and disruptive changes that took place against the Worldwide Church of God after the founder of that organization died and how it relates to similar changes in other churches and especially the Seventh-day Adventist Church.
Jesuits Infiltrated the Seventh-Day Adventist Church and Now Dominate it
Jesuits infiltrated the Seventh-day Adventist Church and now horribly dominate it.
Strange Religion and Worship Literally Concocted Within the Seventh-day Adventist Church
The Celebration Movement and concept of "worship styles" examined.
More truth about the "Progressive" Adventists"!
A "Progressive" Adventist speaks and proves that he sticks around Seventh-day Adventists in order to cause trouble and demand they change and retract their beliefs!

THE HIDDEN POWER BEHIND THE NEW BIBLE VERSIONS!
The most crucial part of the danger of the new bible versions hardly discussed anywhere else!  WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO READ BIBLE TRANSLATIONS THAT WERE CREATED BY PEOPLE WHO ARE LOST??

The Horrifying Ignorance of the Adventist People...
There is no ignorance as horrifying as suffocating ADVENTIST IGNORANCE!
The Horrifying Ignorance of the Adventist People, Part 2!
Strange ideas God's people have about the sign to leave and take flight from the cities!
The Horrifying Ignorance of the Adventist People, Part 3!
The Adventist people live life as usual expecting that the Lord would even feed them in the Time of Trouble even without them making any physical preparations.
The Horrifying Ignorance of the Adventist People, Part 4!
A terrible sorrow will engulf especially Adventists in the near future when they will suddenly be jailed and will not be able to present the truths of their faith even to fellow prisoners.  Their bibles and all their witnessing materials will be taken away from them.
Sabbath School Lessons Containing the Political Agenda of the Jesuits in the Seventh-day Adventist Church!
Sabbath School lessons push the "new" movements and "worship styles" concepts, and therefore attacks veteran Adventists who oppose them.  It then raises doubts about the authority of Ellen White.
Defending Ellen G. White from the doubts raised against her even by Adventist officials!
Ellen White defended against the doubts raised against her.  Anyone who attacks or dilutes or puts to doubt the authority of Ellen White, attacks far more than her and including the Lord Jesus Christ Himself.
Highlights into the war between the SDA denomination and the protesting independent ministries!
The war between the Seventh-day Adventist denomination and the protesting Independent Ministries more clearly defined.
Conclusion about the issue of labels and finding true identity!
More indepth study to see the ramifications of not understanding how to tell who people are.  Showing how our society is being regressed and destroyed by people all among us, who are not what they claim to be, and who support the opposite agenda from even what they are elected to accomplish.

The Jesuits posting here utilize the part of the Jesuit Oath that tells us, "THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS." In this capacity we will find them frequently stating some point they claim is truth, but they can then easily abandon that point without a problem. An example is when the Witch Caillean completely ignores the fact that a Catholic by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death on the newsgroups to then attack any person who exposes the man. She then plants the charge of hate upon the person who values human life and leaves Ted Seeber alone. The same is true when she butts in on any discussion exposing these things about Rome. She then claims we are spreading hatred of the Catholic people by exposing their representatives, the Ustashis of WWII!! Because of this, she then constantly attacks and attacks US AND EXPOSES US! CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? THAT IS NOT SPREADING HATE OF ALL ADVENTISTS?

She already entered to attack the underdogs swarmed in by the super-monsters of the Vatican, she being another one. She told us that Ted Seeber was gone from posting on the newsgroups so long ago. She therefore held the principle that if something is done long ago, it should be forgotten. It was actually not a long time at all, but yet, and since, Ted Seeber has been defended tooth and nail under the most ridiculous points.  She was never there however when the Jesuits were attacking the Adventist Church based upon issues that aroused their paranoia in the nineteenth century.  She however then forgot that Seeber telling us all non-Catholics must die and that persecution is biblical came from concepts that dominated the world a much longer time ago. NOTHING WAS DONE BY THE JESUITS TO STOP THESE PEOPLE FROM MAKING THOSE DANGEROUS STATEMENTS AND VOICING THEM FOR MONTHS ON END!  Don't remind her of this or anything to with do conscience. One minute she will play dunce. The next minute she will condemn you as if she knew you all her life. 

To this date we have not awoken her to the fact THAT SHE, claiming to be a Witch, IS A NON-CATHOLIC!! Her behavior is DISTINCTIVELY JESUIT!! But to confuse this point, she keeps using her mouth persistently to counteract her conclusive actions, telling us she is a witch. She has accused us of hating Witches since we condemned the man who condemn all non-Catholics!!

This is evidence that the Witch Caillean is in favor of the destruction of non-Catholics. We say this BY HER BEHAVIOR!! To therefore combat this, she comes by several times and merely says that she doesn't approve of any type or kind of murder even though she wasted much time ONLY with those who exposed a mass-murderer while daring not to show any disapproval to that mass-murderer. She has put a label upon herself. She says that she is a witch.  If we have not mentioned this before, we mention it again:  Killing non-Catholics was never regarded by the Vatican as MURDER!

Which test is the true test to tell what a person really is?

Again, there is Paul Tooley, he also, after witnessing Ted Seeber even condemning liberty and the American Constitution for a long time with no irritation to him, jumps in to attack us for exposing the monster. Paul Tooley CLAIMS to be Adventist. And being so in the Vatican Anti-matter sense, he has naturally stepped in to tell us that we do not properly represent Adventists: that we were an embarrassment to all Adventists.

Which is a reliable way to actually tell what a man is? Let's get some examples:

We have two beakers on a table. The one on the right we fill with water, and the one on the left we fill with concentrated sulfuric acid. We go to the right bottle and put a label on it entitled, "Water." We go to the beaker on the left and label it, "Sulfuric Acid." Now the labels fit the contents in the bottles. Which then is the best determiner of what is inside the bottles?  The labels show what's in the bottles and what they are.

Let's say we switch the labels now so that the beaker labeled "Water" will now read "Sulfuric Acid" and vice versa. Are we in trouble here? Or what! We see that the labels do not accurately portray what is in the bottle. BUT ONE THING WE DO KNOW IS THAT THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CONTENTS WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME!! If you change the label on the bottle of sulfuric acid, it will always burn holes through most materials. ITS CHARACTERISTICS REMAIN UNCHANGED!

What then happens if President Bush enters the scene with his entourage, his motorcade, his secret service, the media, and every form of noise.  He then steps up with all his credentials and sees the two beakers sitting side by side.  He approaches them properly labeled and then switches the labels.  He tells you without the batting of an eye that you are to trust the labels on the beaker based upon his word.  Would you drink the bottle that's labeled "Water" now?  Hey, the President of the United States has spoken!  You won't listen to him?  We are trying to show you that the characteristics of a man is what classifies him.  You are to know him by his actions and not by what he says or what any other person says about him.  Here then are some examples.

If you are a father, you are supposed to act in certain ways.  Let's say you are one.  You are loving and kind and your children love you.  You however have a problem with alcohol.  In several instances, after indulging, let's say you beat your wife and terrorize her and the children.  If this persists, you may wind up being taken to court.  It is possible that in testifying the children may express doubt that you are their father.  They will mean that you are not when you get drunk, but, depending on how much you have made their lives miserable, they may remember you doing more things their father would not do and tend to forget the times you were loving and kind to them.  They may well say that at times they had doubts that you were their father.

Hopefully we have already shown and convinced you of Jesuits like Andrew and Lamarr Edwards defending lying in a claim it is necessary for the greater good of the universe, if not the cause of God.  They showed how Rahab the Harlot in the Old Testament lied to the people of Jericho and protected the spies sent from the Children of Israel in a move of treason against her own people.  In this example two main characteristics of the Jesuits are documented in history by the Israelites: deception, treason and mass-murder.  We have forgotten that even during the days when Rome OPENLY admitted that she must constantly kill all not of her religion THEY USED THE EXAMPLES OF THE ISRAELITES TO JUSTIFY THE KILLINGS.  Here now Jesuit Lamarr does the same thing.

It was just like Ted Seeber using Acts 5 to tell us that Ananias and Saphira collapsing dead before the Apostle Peter is the proof that persecution is acceptable and biblical.  Using that scripture was ridiculous.  Peter didn't lay a hand on them, and yet, just to humor the deceiver, we compared even records of the killings done by Rome with that example asking him to even show more examples of the Apostolic Church acting like Rome, and he had to again pretend that we never asked him a question.  Would Christians behave like this?  They claim to be Christians, but they even believe in the end justifies the means in order to lie and blaspheme in the worst of ways in a claim this is for the glory of  God.  They then deny that they are Jesuits even though Protestant historical record documents them perfectly.  Would a non-Catholic only attack a person who exposes others posting or saying anywhere that he believes all who are not Catholics must die?  Would a non-Catholic see a statement like that and not be upset about it?  All the Jesuits persist in claiming that they are not Jesuits while behaving like Jesuits are documented to behave.  With that suspicious behavior is the unified and desperate agenda to make sure no one believes that a global conspiracy exists.  Those who do this easily accuse their enemies of not allowing others to disagree, and not understanding that others can disagree.

Since the Jesuits have always used the example of the Israelites to justify killings, and their very doctrines tell us they are the remnant off from the Israelites, is Rome really like them aside from accepting Jesus as the Messiah?  Why would they compare themselves to the Israelites, while at other times they take pride in being different?  Are they to be similar in some ways and different in others?  If you believe that Rome is the true church, and that she is a remnant off from the Israelites which were also a true body of believers, let's take a look at their characteristics historically and show the differences. 

You walk into a room with a pile of books and records on a desk.  You sit down.  Soon after, in walks a typical Jewish Rabbi and a Jesuit priest, each representing their faiths.  They had been invited to appear there by you for some kind of grilling, and they acknowledged the challenge and entered.  Time to check their characteristics aside from the labels they subscribe to themselves.

First, you put your focus on the Jewish Rabbi.  You have all kinds of documents in your hands detailing ancient Jewish history.  You then look the Rabbi dead in the eye and tell him that his religion slaughtered thousands upon thousands of people.  You tell him that at times they showed absolutely no mercy.  You tell him that they killed even little children and babies, at times leaving no one in an area alive [Joshua 11:11-14].  What likely would be the Rabbi's reaction?  I will tell you plainly that it is likely the Rabbi would look you back dead in the eye with a puzzled look, then look down at your material, and then back into your eyes and plainly ask, "...and?"  In other words, he acknowledges that it is true, but then asks in effect, "so what?"

If you were to say the same things to one of the "Everybody" Jesuits, he may well first pretend that he doesn't see the documentation that you have.  He would then, on the other hand, turn around, go to a corner and then insert his wind-up key he got from the Jesuit Oath into his back and wind.  He would then waddle toward you and say continuously, "YOU HATE CATHOLICS!  YOU HATE CATHOLICS!  YOU HATE CATHOLICS!  ANTI-CATHOLIC!  <click> ANTI-CATHOLIC! <click>

Next...

     YOU HATE CATHOLICS!

Question...

     YOU HATE CATHOLICS!

Please...

     YOU HATE CATHOLICS!"

Here we already see a difference.  Jews are not trained to be unscrupulous.  For whatever may even be wrong or not perfect with their religion, we do not know them to be sworn to be dishonest nor to do anything possible to deceive in order to defend their religion.  We saw nowhere where they were considered to gain treasures in heaven by being the more evil, claiming this is for the cause of God.  But yet there is more that all need pay attention to because Rome is what is changing the world and what will ultimately dominate it according to scripture.

Yes the Israelites did kill many, but another difference between them and Rome in that enterprise Teresita told us was biblical because the Jews did it (mass-exterminating all who are not of their faith), is that THEY NEVER TORTURED ANYONE.  They merely slew with the edge of the sword and made the deaths quick.  This is entirely contrary to the history of Rome.  Not only did Rome make it routine to torture, but she found actual delight in doing it.  She had dungeons and actually constructed articles of torture to be used against her enemies, and these are by far not isolated incidents.  Surprised that torture is now being supported by the current administration of the United States government?  [Do you know that on the internet people are declaring that all the tumult and change taking place in the United States is being caused by JEWS?  If that is so, why then is the United States security and governing policy mimicking the Inquisitions and not the Jewish laws?]  Just reference the webpage conservatively detailing the crimes of the Ustashis of WWII which none of the Jesuits have condemned.  It makes Foxe's Book Of Martyrs come alive again!  It is from there that we met the strange "Everybody" Jesuits attacking the Adventist Church [We call them the "Everybody Jesuits" because they keep ranting that we identify "EVERYONE" as Jesuits merely because they disagree with us in debated matters], telling us that Adventist "crimes" bother them intensely, and they tell us we must never name-call a person (especially Jesuits, for obvious reasons) for this demonstrates hate!

Next difference between the Jews and Rome is that when the Jews slaughtered, THEY NEVER SEXUALLY ASSAULTED NOR RAPED THE WOMEN OF THEIR VICTIMS.  It is not recorded that they did so.  If they did do this, trust me, it would have been in the Old Testament writings and God would have taken action against them for it.  In Rome's example the situation is different.  It was consistently documented that the militia of Rome have sexual problems to the point where Protestants are deemed to be satanic, yet the Romish militia can't resist poking their penises into the Protestant women.  We don't believe that this is to extract Satan from them.  Nothing really goes into a man's penis.  Everything only comes out.  This very consistent history takes away from the Romish argument even for the need for persecution and torture of all not Catholic.

Just this point will prove very devastating in the near future.  We say this especially with all the chances taken in the wording of the Patriot Act, where the President himself doesn't always look nor choose how many will be detained indefinitely and then be owned by the government.  If a major calamity hits, millions of people will find themselves detained.  Other officials will make the decisions often of who stays or who goes free.  They can easily claim that a very beautiful woman who happens to be your daughter is suspected.  Hopefully you will know BEFORE THEN (like NOW) that imposing the principles of the Patriot Act upon a free country, especially without a vote is worse than anyone raping your daughter!

Probably the most cataclysmic difference between the two comes from what we have already learned.  One thing that Rome does that the Israelites never did was, DUMB DOWN THEIR VICTIMS!  Rome enters into them to always begin a wave of debating amongst them.  She then injects all kinds of different theories and questions, and then maintains that they are to be held in tensions and constant conflicts, giving validity to all the opposing arguments so that they can be kept in tension.  She sends her imps to shout from the highest places, "Question everything!  Question everything!"  Whenever people understand what she is doing and meet up with her in debate and begin to straighten things out, she resorts to accusing them of her own characteristics, asking why they hate others who merely disagrees with them.  It will not be long before Rome's militia then elect themselves to be the psychiatrists of those who know and understand it is her in operation and what she is doing.  Her imps will then make diagnosis after diagnosis of the mentally challenged state of those peoples' minds, and give these diagnoses without the thought that others might disagree with the findings.  The Israelites instead, gave SURE GUIDANCE to all the nations, constantly pleading with them to forsake idolatry and sin and to follow the light coming from the true God.  SHE DID NOT INFILTRATE ANYWHERE!  She did not live among the nations to teach them how to sin.  Rome does this!

By the Israelites giving terrible evidence against the nations she wound up destroying, through showing them the light and the benefits of obedience to the one and only true God, it will be shown that God did not merely raise up some killing organization.  He Himself raised up the Israelites.  He raised them up to show levels of responsibility and show how He deals with men. 

Deuteronomy 9:4 Speak not thou in thine heart, after that the LORD thy God hath cast them out from before thee, saying, For my righteousness the LORD hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD doth drive them out from before thee.
5 Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
 

Amazing prosperity followed the Israelites as opposed to the other nations.  This was to be a witness to all.  At times, when they backslid, even the Children of Israel wound up being victims of responsibility.  Because Rome does differently, her acts are classified as the worst kind of murder.  The militant portion of her (the Jesuits) dumb her victims down by engulfing them with every form of conflicting theory and debate and class.  Many cannot tell she is the source, because many of these conflicting theories contradict her own doctrines.

You can find out more about this issue on the following links, because this topic itself is just too broad to be covered here:

http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/appealchapdiversityi.html

http://www.Seventh-dayAdventism.com/Insiders.htm

An example dealing with responsibility shown is the Ark of God.  We are not talking about Noah's ark here, for what we are talking about is not even a boat.  It was a major piece of furniture in the Ancient Jewish temple that symbolized the actual shape and appearance of the actual throne that God sits on.  It therefore is an actual symbol or prototype of the presence of God.  Special instructions were given to the Israelites about how to handle it.  No one but the priests were to ever touch it, and even then, it was placed in a very special compartment within the temple that was accessed only one day in a year by the High Priest.  Anyone who violated the sanctity of that article of furniture was struck down dead.  That literally happened to a key character among the Israelites in 2 Samuel 6: Uzzah, who was struck down dead for touching the Ark. 

2 Samuel 6:1 Again, David gathered together all the chosen men of Israel, thirty thousand.
2 And David arose, and went with all the people that were with him from Baale of Judah, to bring up from thence the ark of God, whose name is called by the name of the LORD of hosts that dwelleth between the cherubims.
3 And they set the ark of God upon a new cart, and brought it out of the house of Abinadab that was in Gibeah: and Uzzah and Ahio, the sons of Abinadab, drave the new cart.
4 And they brought it out of the house of Abinadab which was at Gibeah, accompanying the ark of God: and Ahio went before the ark.
5 And David and all the house of Israel played before the LORD on all manner of instruments made of fir wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and on cornets, and on cymbals.
6 And when they came to Nachon's threshingfloor, Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it.
7 And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.
8 And David was displeased, because the LORD had made a breach upon Uzzah: and he called the name of the place Perezuzzah to this day.
9 And David was afraid of the LORD that day, and said, How shall the ark of the LORD come to me?

They were not even supposed to transport the Ark of God on a cart.  They were given special instructions showing that they were supposed to transport it on their shoulders from staves.  Somewhere along the line, they had forgotten that counsel.  They were neglectful.  Yet just earlier the Philistines captured the Ark after defeating the Israelites in battle.  That in itself shows you how neglectful the Children of Israel were, by them being defeated as they were.  Thing is, after the Philistines captured the Ark, they suffered from great supernatural plagues while it was in their possession.  They finally came to the conclusion that they were going to get rid of it. 

1 Samuel 5:9 And it was so, that, after they had carried it about, the hand of the LORD was against the city with a very great destruction: and he smote the men of the city, both small and great, and they had emerods in their secret parts.
10 Therefore they sent the ark of God to Ekron. And it came to pass, as the ark of God came to Ekron, that the Ekronites cried out, saying, They have brought about the ark of the God of Israel to us, to slay us and our people.
11 So they sent and gathered together all the lords of the Philistines, and said, Send away the ark of the God of Israel, and let it go again to his own place, that it slay us not, and our people: for there was a deadly destruction throughout all the city; the hand of God was very heavy there.
12 And the men that died not were smitten with the emerods: and the cry of the city went up to heaven.

The emerods mentioned there is hemorrhoids.  They then reasoned among themselves that they would send the Ark back to the people they captured it from.  What eventually happened was that every time the Philistines transported the Ark, THEY TRANSPORTED IT ON A CART.  Every time they moved it, THEY PUT THEIR HANDS ON IT.  Was anyone struck down dead because of that?  NO!  Therefore a nation not favored of God was allowed to touch the Ark and even transport it incorrectly, and nothing happened to them.  Why is this?

The reason is because they were never given special instructions on transporting the Ark.  They therefore did not give an offense.  That was how God always worked.  He ONLY destroyed those nations after their responsibility for their actions were made plain and they kept doing wrong things.  When the Ark of God was placed near to their god Ekron, as an image, the next day they found the image damaged.  They therefore, after suffering from supernatural plagues, sent the Ark away.

The same issues apply today.

Romans 5:20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

What this is saying is, if there is CONFUSION or a lack of understanding about right and wrong, THE MERCY OF GOD BECOMES GREATER!  That's why people ask today how come the God of the Old Testament was a God of wrath, while the God of the New Testament is a God of love.  That is actually not true, because God knows the future and knows everything.  He is just the same as ever.  He always knew even the pain He would have to experience when coming to die to make an atonement for the sins of the world.  The problem here contrasting with the Israelites is that ROME ALWAYS INJECTS CONFUSION INTO HER ENEMIES.  She always DUMBS THEM DOWN!  We are now in acute confusion everywhere.  That is documented as consistent Jesuit tactics.  Experts on the Papacy were plentiful before and after America won her liberties.  After America won her liberties, such experts were considered very important in churches because of what they meant to the preservation of liberty.  Probably the paramount expert on the Papacy throughout history was J. A. Wylie.  He documented also the fact that the Jesuits, in order to destroy her enemies, always puts them into confusion ("The heretics want the freedom to disagree?  Let's rub their noses in conflicting theories").  They always impress upon those wanting liberty the desire to hear all kinds of conflicting theories about everything in front of them.  By patiently soaking them in this, the Jesuits then begin to question and attack the foundations of their religions and governments AS ANOTHER OPINION.  Soon what develops is the present condition of the United States and the world today where she is now being directed backward in principle by people talking about progression and the DIFFICULT DECISIONS documented that they always wanted well before tragedy and crisis like 911 came!

By giving ample responsibility and light to show what the world was doing, the Children of Israel, based upon rejection of the light by the heathen nations, became a sword used by God against those nations around them.  Yet the only reason why things were that way was because the Israelites themselves sinned before the Lord when they offered a golden calf on Mount Sinai after Moses went up to the mountain to receive the Ten Commandments.  It was the desire of the Lord to fight completely on behalf of the Israelites.  He even told them through Moses to stand still and see the salvation of the Lord just before the Lord opened up the Dead Sea to let the Children of Israel escape from the pursuing Egyptian army.  After they created the golden calf and even before consisting of a mixed multitude, the Lord wound up telling them that they must prepare for war from then on.  Rules were then given them so that they understood what to do in the event for war.  Because they were called to go to war then, they wound up suffering what every nation suffers when there is war: casualties.  They were told that a newly married husband is not to go to war, etc. (Deuteronomy 20).  The Lord therefore made the Children of Israel at that time a seeming killing machine.  He did this because the Children of Israel showed themselves to be a "stiff-necked people."  The Lord decreed then that He will not come down and fight for them among them lest He sees their wickedness also and winds up destroying them too and appearing very fickle to the surrounding nations.

NEXT PART

HOME