THE JESUIT ESTIMATION OF HATRED: Lamarr Edwards/Alan!
The Most Horrible Breed of Killers Known to Modern Times!
Created 03/18/2004
|
Things you need to look for that are common with the Jesuit infiltrators and posters on the newsgroups: Because you are exposing the worst hate cult of the centuries, it is quite clear they have to do something for their own protection in the hopes they can continue what they have done over those centuries. In order to do this, they have to constantly accuse you of hatred. THERE IS A SHOCKING AND TERRIBLE REASON FOR THIS EXPLAINED IN OUR SERIES!! To bolster up this deceit, on their lying lips is the constant four letter word LOVE which they use to denote themselves. If you expose what they're doing, they will always work to attach the word HATE to your name and actions. They are incredibly blasphemous, using Christ's name constantly to support their lies and bringing in some of the most absurd doctrinal positions that may or may not agree with Catholic thinking. They then move to verbally force-establish what is the meaning of these two words (hate/love) and how these two human attributes can be shown from within a person by what he does. They will demand their enemies exercise decent ettiquette in all their dialogues. After a while, they will have to break all those rules they claim are proper human behavior in order to attack their enemies. They do this without a problem! They have to make excuses for this, naturally. They constantly preach against name-calling, making accusations, condemning and personally attacking before, during and after they do it. They claim these actions are proof of hate. They have to constantly babble fiction into facts, making bold statements often without any proof though they are very swift to accuse you of not providing evidence for what you say. Though they demand their enemies prove what they say to make them work hard making posts on the internet, they exempt themselves from the necessity of providing proof for what they say, and then claim all classification of what is fact from fiction belongs only to themselves. Of course, if you are brilliant enough, as is Brother Ted, to prove they are lying, they have an immense habit to perpetually pretend that you didn't post any evidence or questions to them at all. Just as easy is it for them to claim they have answered your questions when they have not. We often ask them to repeat the answer then since they constantly waste bandwidth lying to us that they have answered, and they continue instead to waste bandwidth. Here they are exercising the precepts of the Jesuit Oath, in specific the clause that says, "The End Justifies the Means." http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/JesOath.htm They constantly accuse those who do not fall for their lies of mental illness or kinship to Satan. Lamarr Edwards here has made very key statements against the founding principle of America. He has exclused people who condemned the lives of billions of people while he trails those who expose them. |
Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to extermination. He was followed by Teresita who told us it is "JUST BUSINESS" to exterminate them. What would Lamarr Edwards say to this since he has shown he is very upset with me accusing people of being Jesuits even if they profess to be non-Catholics as he does? What would he say when he constantly accuses us of hating people and fighting with them just because they disagree with us? How will he react to people who deny BILLIONS of people even the right to live because they subscribe to different religious beliefs? Let's find out:
From: Lamarr
Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: #ANDREW HONORS CHRIST? OR BLASPHEMES!!! ATTENTION LAMARR!!!!!...
Date: 2003-02-11 07:15:17 PST
Cindy - Seeber apparently said things that I disagree with.
Thousands do, every day.
Free speech, as granted by the first amendment to the constitution guarantees that right to everyone, including seeber and wormwood.
Our system of government is criticized daily, in a plethora of ways.
Christianity is attacked and ridiculed every day. ( since you have been bird dogging my posts in other groups, you have seen how I have defended Christianity in running discussions with many people at one time, in sometimes brutal exchanges)
These people have a RIGHT to their opinions.
Wormwoods pathological and constant harping about seeber is his right, but to what purpose ?
I object strongly to his, and your efforts to attack Catholicism, and by your methods, offend Catholics,and make them less likely to hear any other views of what they believe.
Do you have the legal right to do so, you bet.
Do I have the legal right to say it is inane and conterproductive and harmful to the Adventist and Protestant messages ? Yes.
Slander and libel in the legal sense must be untrue, and the entry into litigation must be driven by a complantant.
Is Seeber a terrorist ? Has he used violence to further a political or religious viewpoint ?
I don't think so. So why call him one ?
Many, Many say worse things on TV than he has, but their WORDS are protected by the constitution.
Is teddy mac a demon ? I say yes. Does he want to litigate the matter ?, lets go to court.
I am confident that once I get him on the witness stand, no jury would condemn me for using the term.
Everyone can say what they choose, when it comes to accusing someone of specific acts or untrue words, the courts are the official arbiters.
You and wormwood can call amyone, anything you want. The persons who are the receiptiens of your venom can, as they choose, respond.
I have the right to an opinion of what you say, and I will never hesitate to express it. LE
===============
Lamarr excuses the words of Ted Seeber, telling us it doesn't matter what people say:
From: Lamarr
Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: #TED SEEBER CONDEMNED ALL NON-CATHOLICS TO DEATH!!
Date: 2002-12-06 18:15:18 PST
Susie - How is "brother Ted" ? Is he with you as you use your keyboard, or do you metaphysically banish him while you are in charge of his body ?
Where do you go, when he comes back?
WHO CARES what Seeber said ? He is not an official spokesman, nor definer of doctrine for Catholicism.
[My Comment: Since I am a concern for Antichrist Lamarr Edwards, which official spokesman am I for? He already constantly tells me I'm not an Adventist. Why then is he complaining about what I said? If I'm not an official spokesman for the Adventist Church, why does he tell us I'm hurting the credibility of the Adventist Church by sticking up for the lives of billions of people INCLUDING THEM?? We're just debunking the typical Jesuit psycho obedience to the Jesuit Oath here.]
Protestants have said things like, "the only good indian, is a dead indian", "kill'em all and let God sort'em out" and other choice nuggets along the same lines.
These folks did not represent Protestantism either. Are you so abjectly stupid that you can't figure out that anyone can Say anything they want, and what they say is between they and God ?
[My Comment: How stupid then is Jesuit Lamarr? He trails and attacks us then for doing what more than saying things?]
If sodam insane plays golf, does that mean that all of us who play Golf are butchers and killers?
Did your parents sue the doctor that dropped you on your head when you were born ? Was he a Catholic BTW? LE
===========
Now listen to the following commonsense thoughts of President Abraham Lincoln super-terrorists already called us hateful for posting. See if you can see any common sense in the words:
Is it not an absurdity to give a man a thing which he has sworn to hate, curse, and destroy?...
[Our comment: Is it folks? Here is super-damned Vatican Lamarr excusing and defending a man who condemned liberty, the US Constitution and all non-Catholic life! Kind a like watching millions serve in the armed forces and died to have a super-damned despot protecting their enemies on the newsgroups, huh? Abraham Lincoln continues:]
And does not the Catholic Church of Rome hate, curse, and destroy liberty of conscience whenever she can do it safely? I am for liberty of conscience in its noblest, broadest, highest sense. But I cannot give liberty of conscience to the pope and to his followers the papists, so long as they tell me through all their councils, theologians and cannon laws, that their conscience orders them to burn my wife, strangle my children, and cut my throat when they find their opportunity!...
[My Comment: As you can see here, Abraham Lincoln knew and understood THERE WERE REAL AND FOLLOWED JESUIT OATHS! Go and see one of them here:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/JesOath.htm]
This does not seem to be understood by the people today. But sooner or later, the light of common sense will make it clear to every one that no liberty of conscience can be granted to men who are sworn to obey a pope, who pretends to have the right to put to death those that differ from him in religion. -- President Abraham Lincoln, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, pg. 300, 301.
===============
Remember that this Jesuit infiltrator told us that people who condemn all non-Catholics to extermination is merely an exercise of their individual rights, and that there is no problem. What happens if such people are exposed??...
=================
We have already written the following under the nose of the super-terrorist Lamarr Edwards. His take on this quotation was that Lincoln hated Catholics, and then we hate Catholics. He constantly posts to tell us that warning the world about the history of Rome is merely hating Catholics since Protestants were the same, but just killed less. Now, TED SEEBER boldly condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death just more than a year ago, and Lamarr Edwards has done EVERYTHING to protect the monster.
After attacking, slandering and libeling us for a long time telling everyone that we hate people just because they disagree, the man tells us that Ted Seeber, in condemning the document that gives rights to people to disagree, own property and even live, was just expressing his legal right to speak and that the Constitution guarantees that right.
Well let's again remind this other super-terrrorist about the wisdom of Abraham Lincoln, who expressed these words that were posted before. Remember that Lamarr's take on this was the usual knee-jerk response of an unchanging Rome: ANTICATHOLICISM:
Abraham Lincoln says: Till lately, I was in favor of the unlimited liberty of conscience as our Constitution gives it to the Roman Catholics. But now, it seems to me that, sooner or later, the people will be forced to put a restriction to that clause towards the papists. Is it not an act of folly to give absolute liberty of conscience to a set of men who are publicly sworn to cut our throats the very day they have the opportunity? Is it right to give the privilege of citizenship to men who are sworn and public enemies of our constitution, our laws, our liberties, and our lives?
The very moment that popery assumed the right to life and death on a citizen of France, Spain, Germany, England, or the United States, it assumed to be the power, the government of France, Spain, England, Germany, and the United States. THOSE STATES THEN COMMITTED A SUICIDAL ACT BY ALLOWING POPERY TO PUT A FOOT ON THEIR TERRITORY WITH THE PRIVILEGE OF CITIZENSHIP. . . . WHEN POPERY WILL GIVE UP THE POWER OF LIFE AND DEATH WHICH IT PROCLAIMS AS ITS OWN DIVINE POWER IN ALL ITS THEOLOGICAL BOOKS AND CANON LAWS, THEN, AND THEN ALONE, IT CAN BE TOLERATED AND CAN RECEIVE THE PRIVILEGES OF CITIZENSHIP IN A FREE COUNTRY. -- President Abraham Lincoln, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, pg. 300.
So, according to what we see here, it would be suicidal to allow people rights to speech, etc., who have a terrible desire to destroy those rights for others and destroy the document that guarantees this. Why then did Lamarr Edwards claim this document above was Anti-Catholicism???
Why then does the super-terrorist tell us that we hate people just because they disagree, and the man goes nuts posting the most violent and profane attacks against us because of this concept, and he merely tells us a man who denies this right to all non-Catholics BY DEATH, has just expressed his opinions?
====================
From: Lamarr
Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: What has Cindy and Susan wrought?
Date: 2003-01-14 12:19:00 PST
Paul - I have believed for a long time that susan/ted/revor/wormwood had one object in mind, to ultimately bring Adventism, and now EGW into total ridicule and loathing on the internet.
The discussion of who and what EGW was to Adventism must be discussed with reason and respect, recognizing that she was a wise Christian leader, who made some mistakes.
It has now , thanks to susan/ted/trevor/wormwood turned into a situation where her credibility as a Christian is being ripped to shreds, by a backlash to wormwoods incessant maniacal anatgonism.
Cindy, I cannot understand.
Anti Catholicism, instead of Pro Jesus Christ has become her message, and she thinks they are the same.
It is very difficult to help people understand what you believe, when you incessantly attack as being of satan what they believe and hold dear.
When I first became an Adventist, I chose to share with a Protestant friend of mine who was marrying a Catholic, Cindy's message as to why she should not convert to Catholicism.
After my exposition of the beasts and the anti Christ, and the sunday law, all that stuff, she told me, "thanks, you have made things alot easier for me". She converted to Catholiocism the day of her marriage.
THE CHURCH, is the universal body of Christ, which cuts across denominational and some doctrinal lines.
We must, through the love of our brothers and sisters in all denominations, communicate and where we have differences, we must, using patience, kindness, and love, help them to see clearly what we believe, so they can know it now, and in the future.
Using Stalins style to preach what we believe is "truth", only obliterates the truth, and leaves a strong wariness about it. LE
==============
I asked whether or not Lamarr Edwards and his Vatican brothers and sisters went nuts claiming that we don't allow others to disagree with us. After that, I asked how much right does Seeber give to non-Catholics since he condemned them to death just for not being Catholic. He naturally refused to answer:
From: Susan
Williams (salethiel77@rocketmail.com)
Subject: Re: #LAMARR EDWARDS, BEING HIS VATICAN SELF!!
Date: 2003-02-20 20:51:55 PST
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 19:57:20 -0700 (MST), shmogie1@webtv.net (Lamarr Edwards) wrote:
>Sue
2 - The branch davidians were not Seventh Day Adventists, and
>neither is ted/susan/trevor/wormwood, keep that clearly in mind.
>
>None of them were or are Seventh Day Adventists. LE
[But Lamarr claims he is a high form of Protestant with the result he becoming very upset when people expose super-terrorists telling us all non-Catholics must die!]
What proof have you of these charges? Is Paul Tooley, the man who defended Ted Seeber who attacked liberty, the American Constitution and then condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death an Adventist? To you he is, but I happen to know that Adventists don't do such things.
And you also have such terrible Vatican amnesia! You can't remember when specific questions are being presented to you that question your Anti-Adventist and Anti-Protestant behavior. Such as the following-- I want to demonstrate that I give evidence with my postings unlike these Vatican keepers of the Jesuit Oath who know better...
In order to do this, we must read the Protestant documentation from the Reformation to start with. But let's see if we can find some excuse for the existence of Lamarr Edwards after reviewing Protestant documentation of their murderers before we read the Jesuit Oath:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/JesOath.htm
======================
Exchange between Antichrist Lamarr and Brother Ted:
shmogie1@webtv.net
(Lamarr Edwards)
wrote in message news:<18248-3C974F6C-139@storefull-298.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
> ted/susan
- Cindy is making a supreme effort to reason with you and
> love you.
But you are a despot too? Why couldn't she love me like Ted Seeber? Why can't you???? She is a worker for the Antichrist. Therefore she hates the air I breathe. I listen and respect her words like she respects mine. Claiming to love me doesn't cut it. She reacted quite differently to me than she did to her fellow super-terrorist worker for the Antichrist.
Are you giving us again your Jesuit opinion? Why can't she love the people whom terrorist Seeber condemned?
About trying to reason with people and love them according to despots who tolerate no disagreement, I have to say that your Pope has done that so often, it is no surprise.
> she
has apologised to you for anything and everything she could have
> possibly said or done.
And has done it again and again and again after the apology and continues in the same mode to prove me mean. She has attacked me constantly and even viciously on the grounds that I send uncivil posts. She told me I cannot bring up the issue of a man condemning all non-Catholics to persecution and death. Vicious posts now come from another terrorist papist by the name of Lamarr Edwards and nothing stirs within her soul. The verdict is that she was lying from the beginning. She has no problem with uncivil posts--she has given quite a few herself.
I bring this up and she evades the facts as she always has that needed an apology.
> Why
attempt blame to her for posts I made ages ago, your beef, devil
> boy/girl is with me, not her.
Let me take you back to kindergarten so that you at least can no more be a despot. Don't ask questions you already know the answer for. To her, like you and the other workers of the Antichrist, it is worse to be uncivil in posts than to condemn all non-Catholics. Another worker for the Antichrist has given the worst uncivil posts and this has been continuous not just from you, but from all quarters. Vatican Cindy cannot notice. She needs to apologize for this, but cannot, for to apologize is supposed to mean she will not continue lying to the people.
She works for your Antichrist also.
> I know
who your father is, I know from whence you come, I know your
> purpose.
>
> Cindy is prepared to believe you are human, I am not, therefore I will
> not treat you as a human, but as the demon you are.
Of course I am not human to the murderers of the Saints. This more explains your horrible cruelty. Of course I'm not human. I had the gall to recognize that someone condemned all non-Catholics and gloated over the mass-massacres of millions of God's children. If only I was normal as you people guilty of those things, I would get so much hell!
> You disrupt, howl and abuse and accuse.
[Our comment:
What then is Lamarr doing now?]
Gonna kill me like you have so many others throughout history who went to their
graves on the same charges?
> You
are vehement and nasty in worrying about the speck of sawdust you
> think you see in the eyes of others.
Oh so condemning all non-Catholics is a spec of sawdust compared to reproving the monster? I will look like a monster in the eyes of monsters, so I'm not surprised. Remaining calm and doing everything to turn all eyes away from another fellow monster is no spec of sawdust. Millions were killed. You are clearly the children of Satan.
> Your
whole game is to discredit everyone, and especially Adventism,
> because you represent it as a mad dog would represent doves.
You mean after Seeber, Cindy, you and others condemned all non-Catholics? A super-terrorist did this and you all have done everything to cover him up and ignore what was done.
> You
are evil, wicked, and sly, lost souls are a triumph for you, because
> you want them to share hell with you, and you want to snatch from them
> any hope of salvation, because you hate them for that hope.
More uncivil postings. Will not God burn you people alive? Already guilty of the crime of mass-murder, you add to it by committing the Vatican concern and crime you claim is submitting uncivil posts. How will you escape the damnation of hell?
> Ya
don't fool me devil boy/girl, I have closely read everything you have
> posted in this group for well over a year, I have even allowed you to
> create in me anger frustration, another of your goals, but no more
> wormwood jr., you, or more appropriately, the spirit that controls you,
> may drive fine people away, may make the most absurd assertions about
> what others believe, may howl at the moon for all I care, and I will
> stay right here, and I will NEVER tire of exposing your satanic ways,
> your satanic words,your attempt to be a wolf in sheeps clothing.
>
> All of your bombast and vitriol means nothing to me, for it is
> impossible for you to tell anything but lies.
I'm glad I really upset Lamarr. Bring out the holy water.
I love you Antichrist Lamarr! I love you!
The Lord bless you and keep you. The Lord let his face shine upon you, and be gracious to you. The Lord look upon you kindly and give you peace.
Numbers 6: 24-26
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac1238@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
============
Susan interacts with the Jesuit…
shmogie1@webtv.net (Lamarr Edwards) wrote in message news:<22239-3E256F6F-7@storefull-2372.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
> Cindy
- I did once call susan/ted/trevor/wormwood an ass, then admitted
> it was wrong a few days later.
We did call you a scoundrel, an infiltrator and an unscrupulous keeper of the Jesuit Oath. And we confirmed it the very minute we revealed this fact and we keep confirming it all the time!
> I have
posted in anger things that I am not particularly proud of, and
> have apologised, so my conscience on that score is clear.
But you are a liar because you keep doing it! Now that you keep doing it, you know everyone who disagrees with you needs mental help, but also needs to understand that people will disagree. Then they know you keep the Jesuit Oath!!
Now the demon apologized for certain things, didn't he? He told us we can disagree? Now listen to the scoundrel just one sentence later:
> You
remind me of the third grader who is always complaining about the
> less serious things others do, (sawdust in the eye), while doing more
> serious things ( a beam in the eye).
We complained about a man who attacked the US Constitution for years. The man then NATURALLY condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death. Will Suzanne has been complaining about some atrocities he claims were done after he dismissed the worst killers of the 20th century as clean and fitting representatives of the Catholic people today. Who then is this demon to complain about the column in his eye that Samson pushed over?
> Being
right is not the end in itself, if one has the responsibility to
> help others understand.
A sound admission that we are right! However the Jesuits are always telling us it matters not what lie we tell just so long as we do it sweetly!!
> Some
of the Reformers were completely right, Knox is an example, but
> they were arrogant, mean spirited, and nasty.
Not compared to their persecutors, OF COURSE ACCORDING TO THIS ONE!
> They
earned themselves martyrdom, but if they had been a little more
> "Christian" in relating to potential converts and their enemies,
perhaps
> they could have done more in their personal evangelism.
If Lamarr Edwards had ever accepted the movement, he would never have condemned God's saints here. He is so up on niceness, he cannot notice that a man condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death:
but when you are so trained to call evil good, you have to then condemn good with all gusto!!
> It
is not compromising with the enemy to find common ground with our
> Catholic friends, who are alive right now, who have tortured and killed
> no one, who do good works in the name of Jesus Christ, who have great
> faith in Jesus Christ, and who want to follow him completely.
[Is this true? He missed Ted Seeber condemning all non-Catholics to extermination claiming persecution of all not of his religion is BIBLICAL! Why couldn't he understand the arguments for common good he is now making and continues to make? Killing all non-Catholics is common good?]
IT IS NOT COMPROMISING WITH THE ENEMY TO FIND COMMON GROUND WITH SUSAN WILLIAMS, OUR PROTESTANT FRIENDS, WHO ARE ALIVE RIGHT NOW, WHO HAVE TORTURED AND KILLED NO ONE, WHO DO GOOD WORKS IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST, WHO HAVE GREAT FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST, AND WHO WANT TO FOLLOW HIM CLOSELY.
BUT USTASHI LAMARR EDWARDS, PAUL TOOLEY, WILL SUZANNE AND THE OTHER CATHOLIC INFILTRATORS KEEP TELLING US THAT WORTHY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CATHOLIC PEOPLE ARE THE WORST KILLERS OF THE 20TH CENTURY: THE USTASHIS OF WWII!!!!
> We
should be reasoning as friends with them about the Bible, not hurling
> vile and acerbic accusations at them, and creating enemies.
You mean like you do with those who agree with the US Constitution and who don't believe that all Protestants should die?
> You
seem to think that if satan is singing the song you want to sing,
> then you must join him.
So we sing songs you don't want to sing, and you claim we are insane and leech upon us in order to defend your pope!
> As they say, Hitler made the trains run on time.
We worry more about him putting non-Catholics on the tracks as those trains go by!
> In
the hands of the enemy, the "truth" without "Christianity",
simply
> becomes an icepick to slip into the enemies heart, and serves no
> purpose. LE
THE JESUITS MOTTO:
IT IS BETTER TO LIE SWEETLY TO ETERNAL DEATH YOUR ENEMIES, INSTEAD OF TO SCATHINGLY GIVE THE TRUTH!
That's why these scoundrels pounced upon Moses when he returned from off the mount with the first tables of the Ten Commandments!
In His Grace,
Susan
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1781-3DE2DA78-323%40storefull-2376.public.lawson.webtv.net
From: Lamarr Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: #THE STANDARD FOR HATE II !
Date: 2002-11-25 18:45:09 PST
Paul - You are correct. The Ted Team has gone too far on this one.
They have attributed specific heinous criminal acts to a specifically named person, written in a public forum.
Libel it is.
I think mr. Seeber could also make a case for harassment and defamation.
Mr. Seeber. Perhaps the only way to get the teddy mac team to drop its fixation on you is to sue them. They have now crossed the line.
If you read this, consider contacting an attorney.
Sue, Ted, wormwood et al. I would strongly advise that you people post a retraction re this accusation.
Further, you have been flirting with the line for some time. A specific name coupled with a specific crime, or other despicable act, that you cannot prove, is doom for you guy's
Just because everyone chooses to treat you like the harmless village idiot, does not mean that when you commit harm, your cover will hold.
Take this warning, or not, as you choose.
When the knock comes, you have no one to blame but your self. LE
From: Lamarr
Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net)
Subject: Re: I'm hurt, Susan Williams
Date: 2003-02-01 14:15:08 PST
Doug - The Italian word for what we are seeing here is "vendetta".
Dwelling
on the past, and past crimes by Catholics, or Protestants, is
ludicrous.
Did Catholic
authorites hunt down, torture, and murder Protestants, you
bet.
Did Protestants do the same, only on a smaller scale, you bet.
Have muslims murdered Catholics and Protestants, you bet.
Have Hindu's been murdered by Protestants and Catholics, of course.
This litany could go on and on, but you get the point.
Wormwood
and his pal are stuck in the vendetta mode, as if they can do
anything to change history, but they cannot restrain their carefully
nutured lust for '"revenge" !.
Now, is
now, and Adventists have been waiting for some 160 years for
their view of the end to occur, and it might, tomorrow, or 500 years
from now.
These two
NON ADVENTISTS have latched on to the most gruesome and vile
part of what they think might happen, and roll in it, then shower with
it, then dive back into it.
They love
it, the bloodier and macabre it can be, the more it floats
their boat.
They cannot
accept today for what it is, and people for who they are
today, they must run down their yellow brick road of sado masochism as
quickly as they can.
Most members
of the SDA church, which they are not, never resort to this
mindless prattling, these two do not represent true SDA's. LE
Imagine us being concerned about these things he said, just because two people distinctly told us all non-Catholics must die, followed by a host of non-Catholics jumping upon us telling us we are insane and hateful for name-calling! Lamarr Edwards told us they just spoke words and didn't kill anybody. He is now boiling over and confirming many words written throughout history and upon Jack Chick's website!
Here below, Jesuit Lamarr Edwards is forcing down my throat that I accept that I am "wormwood" whom he claims is a bitter demon. After they attacked me and then preached against name-calling, I said, referring to me, this is "wormwood." Meaning the one whom they have so named because I'm upset at people telling us all non-Catholics must die boldly on the newsgroups. True to their description on all historic Protestant documentation and the Jack Chick website, they begin forcing us to believe I've accepted the name. After telling us that people claiming all non-Catholics must die is merely an exhibition of them expressing their free rights and that they should have those rights, he is here attacking me for exposing them:
Doug - Its whole emphasis is to discredit, confuse, and mis represent God.
It screams like an un Christian Protestant on a cocaine jag to
Drive Protestants away from Catholics, and vice versa
Verify the opinion of many, that SDA's are crazed fanatics
Condemn any and every Christian of whatever denomination
Divide any and every Christian from any and every Christian
Convince every Catholic that Protestant theology is unclean, and to be rejected.
Convince every Protestant that Catholics are scheming, lying, tools of .............. guess who
This is a true, and damning indictment, the source of the motive is very clear to me. LE
Cindy - Fact is, it has acknowledged the name, and accepted it.
This was not out of ignorance, as I have explained to it more than once that it was a demonic name.
You may have serious doubts when I say, but when the manifistation itself accepts the name?
Every post it has ever made is blatantly accusatory, Catholics, Protestants, Jews, wiccans, whomever , have been subjected to the most vile tirades.
Even you, who in your faulty wisdom, attempted to appease it, were excoriated by it.
"there are none so blind as those who will not see"
Your pal is of the devil Cindy, it says so. LE
These Jesuits, in order to cover over what I have found have been constantly wasting manhours posting concerns that I am Brother Ted. These are the ones who have the accusation of PARANOIA on their forked tongues every minute against people who understand who they are and what they're doing. To demonstrate more of his hate against my rights to post what I feel, he wrote this poetry against me:
Subject:
Re: Tired of these ramblings
Date: 2003-09-16 13:48:07 PST
Oh sweet sue, what gender are you ?
Or do you know, from day to day, whether it will be a girl or boy you will play ?
Your words that condemn, don't bother me at all, because I know you are legally insane, and heading for the great fall.
Your demon inside, screams loud and shrill, but I laugh, because I know you are satans best shill.
For a comedy routine, your act is the best, but I am sorry, your brain would serve better as a birds nest.
So keep taking those meds, and see the doc, but you always be for me, one hilarious crock.
Haldol, thorazine and all of the dope, still hasn't kept you from being a vworthless mope.
So you whacked
out mental retard, keep on talking, you make me laugh so hard. LE
My Reply?
From: Susan
Williams (SWilliams07171964@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: Tired of these ramblings
Date: 2003-09-16 17:44:58 PST
You need to kiss me Antichrist Lamarr. MY YOUR HATE TAKES THE CAKE!!
On Tue,
16 Sep 2003 13:38:27 -0700 (MST), shmogie1@webtv.net (Lamarr
Edwards) wrote:
>Oh sweet sue, what gender are you ?
Oh terrible servant of the Antichrist, what type of killer are you?
>Or do
you know, from day to day, whether it will be a girl or boy you
>will play ?
Or whether you can lie or kill in any other new particular way!
>Your
words that condemn, don't bother me at all, because I know you are
>legally insane, and heading for the great fall.
You lie
so much you keep posting to whom does not bother you about
that fall. You told us Seeber condemning people to death is nothing
because he only spoke words and didn't kill anybody. How come you
missed the great cry you made about my crimes before last Fall and
even after and all?
>Your
demon inside, screams loud and shrill, but I laugh, because I know
>you are satans best shill.
You have
enough time to do that around your preoccupative posts that
can't understand questions are being asked you before and after the
kill?
>For a comedy routine, your act is the best,
Comedies
don't normally keep demons up at nights. Why does it do that
for you?
>but
I am sorry, your brain
>would serve better as a birds nest.
It can tell
when it is being asked questions. Why can't yours?
Continue with your Vatican killer hate and your support of a man who
condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death! You lying
claiming to be non-Catholic should not make you fret!
>So keep taking those meds,
As all the
Protestants condemned by your killer cult did and now
they're all dead!
>and
see the doc, but you always be for me,
>one hilarious crock.
When your
killer cult learns to tell the truth, I will believe and set
to your words my clock. But since you are a member of the worst lying
and killer organization since Christianity at birth, I know where to
point when I am asked for the cult most closely related to Satan on
the earth!
>Haldol,
thorazine and all of the dope, still hasn't kept you from being
>a vworthless mope.
You promise
it will make me a damned killer super-terrorist deceiver
as thou?
>So you
whacked out mental retard, keep on talking, you make me laugh so
>hard. LE
Let me make you laugh some more:
Why ask questions, Jesuit Lamarr?
Since when
would a non-Catholic (a.k.a. YOU) would be concerned that a
person who condemned all non-Catholics to perseuction and death has
been exposed? You were!
You said
Seeber didn't kill anybody but just gave approval to the
killings of all non-Catholics. You said there was no problem
therefore, and that Seeber had a right to his opinions. He only just
spoke words.
You then
have been screaming to all hell about me because you claim I
name-call and villify all Christians.
How could you then be concerned about anyone's behavior?
In His Grace,
Susan
Lastly, this man begins to teach us the politicals principles of the most brutal of regimes, the Communist and the Nazis. True to his colors, he first proceeds to tell us under his crusade for disagreement in freedom that we don't know anything about the Constitution of the United States:
From: Lamarr
Edwards (shmogie1@webtv.net) Subject: Re: Liberty endangered
Date: 2004-01-28 15:15:03 PST
Cindy - Sorry, but since Adam God has not given anyone "rights".
Mankind has been under the god of this world, and the very imperfect, flawed, and sometimes brutal governments that exist.
"Rights" are given by and protected by the government, not God.
You are regurgitating the same old SDA boogeyman stories, without any understanding of what you speak.
To compare hitler's Germany to the United States is sheer idiocy, how long do you think your baloney would have been tolerated there ?
Your constitutional right to free speech has been protected by the government, not limited by it, your right to freedom of worship has been protected by the government, not limited by it.
You don't even understand the Patriot act, or the Constitution for that matter, where just men, not God, spelled out what would be your rights in the US.
The pope has said many laudable things, and many that I agree with, is every word that comes from the mans mouth automatically evil?
He says war is evil, and the downtrodden should have respect, and genocide is terribly wrong, and abortion is wrong, because Bush agree's with some of his words, the President is hitler ?
Are we to assume that you believe exactly opposite of whatever the pope might say ?
I know, in your odd non SDA, SDA cult world, martyrdom calls to you, and the government is so worried about you and your sole knowledge of " the truth", that they are ready to jump on you any minute with the dreaded, "national sunday law " !!!
The truth is, no body in the government cares that you go to church on Saturday, and there are no government conspiracies afoot to kill you because you won't go to church on sunday, they just don't care.
In fact, the Supreme court has been finding more and more for your kind of religious liberty, and has been, in a number of ways trampling on the rights of other Christians, for whom you don't give a rats rear
I have no doubt that if those who think like you had the power, your "religious liberty" would look just like that of other religious groups who have the ONLY truth, Catholicism of the middle ages, The Puritans, the taliban and so on.
The Constitution and the government protects the rest of us from bug eyed, slathering, religious zealots and opressors, it does not empower them.
Bob Dylan sang a song, it said, "you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing".
If you objectively LOOKED at what is happening in the world, and how the world is more and more demanding the "right" to approve US policy, and how the world through the UN or some other world government wants to meddle in the internal affairs of the US, then you might have a clue as to where your rights, assured by the US government, might be violated.
But no, you have " the truth", no matter how demonstrably non existent, and a totally, complete, closed mind, so you thrash about at the windmills, only caring for your form of "religious rights", oblivious to anything else.
Religion
of any kind is in big trouble in this country, because secularism, and a numbness
to any religion is becoming the way, as it already has in Europe, and the threat
is not from a government that enforces religion, but a religion that dies because
the people just don't care any more. LE
This is the man who tells us people who condemn all non-Catholics in the billions merely expressed their RIGHTS!!
OUR NATIONAL LEADERS HAVE THE SAME CAPABILITIES OF THIS SUPER-CRIMINAL! THEY ARE RESTRICTED BY LAW, BUT SOON THEY WILL HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO AGAIN SHOW THEIR TRUE COLORS TO THE UNIVERSE ENCAPSULATED IN A TIME OF TROUBLE SUCH AS WAS NOT SINCE THERE WAS A NATION AND EVEN TO THAT SAME TIME IN JUST THE NEAR FUTURE! (Daniel 12:1)
The arguments would continue forever with these super-terrorists who now control our government, military, educational systems, media, entertainment, etc.! These are the killers of the Antichrist whom reason has never reached even after the passing of more than a millenia and a half! Lamarr keeps following the Jesuit Oath and just keeps pushing his accusations and ducking my questions that show he is skillfully lying.
END
TO THE ADVENTIST BETRAYAL PAGE